【摘要】 基于当前农村基层社会矛盾现状,结合问卷调查的结果,以理性人为前提,用成本和收益理论分析了农村基层社会矛盾各种解决机制———和解、调解、诉讼与信访的运行情况。结果发现,现行农村基层矛盾解决机制运行中存在的问题:诉讼机制成为当事人的劣后选择;当事人过分依赖调解与和解机制;信访机制被架空等。进一步分析了问题产生的根源:诉讼机制的各项成本均偏高;强制执行力的不足导致和解及调解机制存在收益偏低的风险;信访成本收益的失衡导致农民将其视为最差选择。最后提出了构建成本较低且收益较高的农村基层矛盾解决机制的建议:针对标的额小的婚姻、继承等家庭纠纷和债务纠纷,主张采用调解或者和解机制;针对"利益大"的一些案件,如土地、承包经营等问题,可以先调解,调解不成再诉讼;针对农村黑恶势力的案件,以诉讼为主;万不得已才选用信访。更多还原

【Abstract】 According to the current social contradictions in rural grass roots and results of surveys,this paper used the cost and profit theory to unscramble the move of various mechanism of settlements,such as reconciliation,conciliation,litigation and letter petition with law and economics analysis methods and the rational man premise.The law and economics analysis reveals the questions in the move of mechanism in settlements of social contradictions in rural grass roots as below:litigation has been the last choice;the parties are too dependent on reconciliation and conciliation;letter petition is unpractical.The paper also clarified the underlying reasons such as,the higher cost of litigation;lack of executive force results in the risk of lower income from reconciliation and conciliation;unbalanced cost-benefit of letter petition leads to the worse choice by peasants.All the analysis above contributed to the final proposal of building a multi-dimensional mechanism of settlement of social contradictions to benefit rural grass roots at the lowest cost.Firstly,reconciliation and conciliation are adopted against part of the small-scale family dispute over marriage and inheritance,and debt dispute;secondly,reconciliation can be firstly used to deal with high benefit cases like land and contractual operation before litigation comes into use;thirdly,litigation can be mainly used ainst evil power in rural area.At last,letter petition can be chosen in case of no alternative.更多还原