【摘要】 以《联合国气候变化框架公约》和《京都议定书》为核心的气候变化国际法律体系未能有效减缓全球变暖,应构建具有"硬法"性质的国际法律体系。在比较国别减排、碳税、碳预算等方案后,确认以财产权为逻辑基点来分配公共物品具有更好的心理易受性和理论自洽性。具体作法是将减缓全球变暖视为大气对温室气体的环境容量,将其作为一项财产并按一人一权原则平均分配给全球民众。更多还原

【Abstract】 The international law system of climate change,taking the "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change"and the"Kyoto Protocol"as the core,failed in mitigating the global warming. So we should reconstruct an international legal system with a"hard law". After comparing the countries’ proposals of carbon emission reduction,the carbon tax,and the carbon budget,it would be confirmed that taking the property rights as the logical basic point to allocate public goods has easy receptivity of psychology and self-consistent theory. The concrete way is that mitigating global climate warming should be regarded as an environmental capacity of greenhouse gases,and then taking it as a kind of property to be assigned to all people around the world according to the principle of"one human-one emission right".更多还原