节点文献

吸收古代政治协商精华 建设中国特色协商民主

To Absorb the Essence of Ancient Political Consultation and to Construct Consultative Democracy with Chinese Characteristics

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 司季勤张国安

【Author】 SI Ji-qin,ZHANG Guo-an(Department of Marxism,Guizhou University,Guiyang,Guizhou,550025,China)

【机构】 贵州大学马列部

【摘要】 中国历代封建王朝政治协商的主要载体和制度性机构就是廷议制和谏议制。但这两种政治协商机制从运行目的、决策机制和法律制约机制来说都不属于真正的协商民主。不过,在两种协商机制运行过程中所表现出的善于和勇于协商、敢于诤谏的精神,值得我们学习;同时我们应该反省和避免其纠错机制所产生的暴力和社会动乱后果。借鉴和吸收古代政治协商的经验教训,促进当下有中国特色的协商民主建设,必须和选举民主、党的领导、党内民主、法制建设同步进行,避免重蹈古代政治协商的覆辙。

【Abstract】 The system of court meeting and the system of suggestion at court is the main carrier and institutional mechanism in the political consultation in the feudal dynasties in China.However from the angle of operation purpose,these two kinds of political consultation mechanism,and decision-making mechanism and legal restriction mechanism cannot be defined as real democracy.However,those who have shown good and braving courage in the process of consultation are worthy of learning.At the same time we should reflect on the mechanism of correcting error and avoid the consequences of violence and social turmoil.Taking for reference and absorbing the useful experiences and lessons of ancient political consultation,it is beneficial for us to promote the present construction of the consultative democracy with Chinese characteristics.We should keep in mind that the consultative democracy must be carried out simultaneously with electoral democracy,the leadership of the party,inner-party democracy,and legal system development.In this way,we can avoid repeating the mistakes from the ancient political consultation.

【基金】 国家社科基金项目“西部农村贫困代际传递问题研究”[12BKS033]的阶段性研究成果
  • 【文献出处】 贵州大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年01期
  • 【分类号】D627;D092
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】300
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络