节点文献

耦合Level Set方法处理介质界面研究

Comparison of Coupled Level Set Methods for Interface Treatment

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王星马天宝郝莉

【Author】 WANG Xing;MA Tian-Bao;HAO Li;State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology,Beijing Institute of Technology;Science school,Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture;

【机构】 北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室北京建筑工程学院理学院

【摘要】 研究了耦合Level Set(LS)方法处理介质界面算法,通过对比旋转流场和剪切流场下的界面捕捉情况,给出了各种不同方法在处理介质界面过程中的优缺点,分析了产生这种现象的原因。通过对比分析得到,耦合粒子Level Set(Particle Level Set,PLS)方法以及耦合Level Set和VOF(Coupled Level Set and Volume of Fluid,CLSVOF)方法相比于单纯的LS方法,在流体守恒性质方面有很大的提高,PLS方法可以根据撒播粒子和精确追踪示踪粒子修正LS界面;而CLSVOF方法可以通过重构界面和体积输运,重新初始化LS函数。在实际物理应用中,PLS方法多次重新撒播示踪粒子会降低界面精度,且对每个示踪粒子的追踪需要加大CPU内存,而CLSVOF方法更加高效和合理。

【Abstract】 The coupled Level Set(LS)method algorithm of medium interface treatment was studied. Advantages and disadvantages of different methods in medium interface treatment process were given by comparing different solution of rotating flow and shearing flow,and the reason is analysed.Particle Level Set(PLS)method and Coupled Level Set and Volume of Fluid(CLSVOF)method are greatly improved in the conservation property of fluid compared on the pure LS through the contrast test.For PLS method,the LS interface can be corrected through reseeding and tracking the particle accurately. For CLSVOF method,the LS function can be reinitialized by reconstructing the interface and transporting the volume.In practical application,the CLSVOF method is more efficient and reasonable,since frequently reseeding will reduce the accuracy and tracking each particle requires more CPU memory for PLS method.

【基金】 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2010CB832706);国家自然科学基金(11032002,11172041)
  • 【文献出处】 高压物理学报 ,Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年05期
  • 【分类号】O35
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】180
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络