节点文献

应用层次分析法建立护理硕士专业学位临床能力考评指标体系的研究

Construction of Clinical Competence Evaluation System for Students with Master of Nursing Specialist Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 沐菊王爱敏尼宏莉贺金晓

【Author】 MU Ju, WANG Ai-min, NI Hong-li, et al. Nursing School, Medical College of Qingdao University,Shandong province, 266021 China

【机构】 青岛大学医学院护理学院青岛大学医学院附属医院关节外科

【摘要】 目的:确定护理硕士专业学位研究生临床能力考评指标体系各级指标及其权重系数,实现护理硕士专业学位研究生考评的科学化、规范化。方法:采用Delphi法对34位专家进行函询,利用层次分析法建立层次结构模型,构造判断矩阵,计算指标权重并检验其逻辑一致性。结果:最终确定的护理硕士专业学位研究生临床能力考评指标体系一级指标权重值分别为"职业道德"(W=0.2309),"临床实践能力"(W=0.3226),"临床教学能力"(W=0.1324),"临床管理能力"(W=0.1747),"临床科研能力"(W=0.1394)。各级指标的层次单排序及总排序一致性比率(CR)均小于0.10,具有满意的一致性检验结果。结论:本次护理硕士专业学位研究生临床能力考评指标体系权重的研究,可以使得该指标体系的评价结果更为科学、可靠。

【Abstract】 Objective: To set up weight coefficient for indexes of Clinical Competence Evaluation System (CCES) so as to implementacomprehensivescientificandnormativesystem for assessment ofStudents withMaster of NursingSpecialist(MNS). Methods: The level construction tree model was established by a questionnaire survey of 34 specialists based on Delphi method. The weight of each indicator in three grades and consistency check were calculated. Results: In the first-level indicators, the weights value of professional ethics (W=0.2309), clinical practical capacity (W=0.3226), clinical teaching ability (W=0.1324), clinical management ability (W=0.1747),clinicalscientificresearchability(W=0.1394), respectively. The results of the consistency check of the single level sorts and total sorts had a satisfied consistency (CR<0.10). Conclusion: The study on weighting values of CCEStoevaluateclinicalcompetenceofMNScouldmakeCCESmorescientificandreliable.

【基金】 2011年山东省研究生教育创新计划资助项目(SDYY11182)
  • 【文献出处】 中国护理管理 ,Chinese Nursing Management , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年03期
  • 【分类号】R47-4
  • 【被引频次】65
  • 【下载频次】562
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络