【摘要】 公益诉讼起诉资格作为"谁"有资格提起诉讼的问题,在性质上属于案件的程序性要件,而迥异于民事诉讼法中建立在案件实体性问题基础上的当事人适格理论。根据政策的动态不一致性理论,宏观调控主体违背承诺,调控受体建立在合法预期理论基础上的信赖利益因此受到了损害,从而满足了公益诉讼起诉资格的核心要件"实际损害"。直接授予遭受"实际损害"的调控受体以公益诉讼起诉资格不仅不会产生学界最为关注的讼累问题,还为调控受体提起公益诉讼提供了激励机制。事实上,此种公益诉讼起诉资格类型化的构建路径也为当下的公益诉讼的立法提供了另外一种可能。更多还原

【Abstract】 As the matter of"who"having the right to file a suit,the nature of public action standing is a procedural requirement,which is different from the theory of qualified parties. According to the dynamic inconsistency theory of policies,the regulated entities’ reliance benefits based on the legitimate expectations theory are injured when the regulatory subject violates the promise,thus,"injury in fact",the core requirement of public litigation standing is satisfied. Granting the regulated entities suffered"injury in fact"public action standing directly can not only raise the the issue of cases flood most highlighted by the academia,which but also may provide the regulated entities with incentives to file a suit. Actually,this categorized way of the standing construction concerning public litigation offers another possibility to the law- making of public litigation.更多还原