节点文献

微创手术治疗体外震波无效的输尿管上段结石疗效比较

Therapeutic effect of minimally invasive surgery in treating upper ureteral calculi after failed ESWL

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 朱建国孙兆林刘军王元林陈卫红单刚徐述雄石华

【Author】 Zhu Jianguo,Sun Zhaolin,Liu Jun,Wang Yuanlin△,Chen Weihong,Shan Gang,Xu Shuxiong,Shi Hua(Department of Urology,the People’s Hospital of Guizhou Province,Guiyang,Guizhou 550002,China)

【机构】 贵州省人民医院泌尿外科

【摘要】 目的探讨体外震波(ESWL)处理输尿管上段结石无效后经逆行输尿管镜(URL)、微创经皮肾镜碎石(MPCNL)或后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石(RLU)治疗的有效性、安全性。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2012年1月该院采用3种微创方式治疗180例ESWL无效的输尿管上段结石患者的资料,比较3种微创治疗术式的结石清除率。结果 URL一次治疗成功率71%,MPCNL与RLU为100%。URL术后1个月结石清除率为86%。结论 MPCNL与RLU结石清除率高,URL结石清除率较低但手术时间短,需要根据情况选择治疗方式。

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of three minimally invasive surgical approaches(URL,MPCNL and RLU) for treatment ESWL-failed upper ureteral stones.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 180 upper ureteral calculi patients treated with those above methods in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2012.The stone-free rate was considered as an indicator for comparing.Results The stone-free rate of URL,MPCNL and RLU were 71%,100% and 100%,respectively.The stone-free rate of URL one month after operation was 86%.Conclusion Compared to the URL,the MPCNL and RLU have higher clearance of calculi.However,URL has the shorter operation time.The choice of treatment should be according to patients′ condition.

【基金】 贵州省科技厅基金(黔科合J字[2011]2254号);贵州省科技厅联合基金(黔科合LS字[2012]006号);贵州省科教青年英才培养工程(黔省专合字[2012]185号)
  • 【文献出处】 重庆医学 ,Chongqing Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年20期
  • 【分类号】R699
  • 【被引频次】13
  • 【下载频次】59
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络