节点文献

腹腔镜与无张力疝修补治疗复发性腹股沟疝对比分析

Comparison of laparoscopic vs open mesh techniques for recurrent inguinal hernias

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 靳根峰冯建超刘勇郭富安李玉凤

【Author】 JIN Gen-feng,FENG Jian-chao,LIU Yong,GUO Fu-an,LI Yu-feng.Department of General Surgery,The People’s Hospital of Xinzheng City,Xinzheng 451150,China

【机构】 河南省新郑市人民医院普外科

【摘要】 目的评价腹腔镜下治疗复发性腹股沟疝的安全性与有效性,讨论术式的选择。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2012年1月收治的58例复发性腹股沟疝的临床资料。其中腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)27例,开放式无张力修补术31例。术后患者均得到随访,随访时间2~42个月(中位时间18个月)。结果二组手术时间差异(P=0.072)、术后住院天数无差异(P=0.067)、术后第二天疼痛分数(VAS)差异(P=0.084)、2周内恢复非限制性活动例数差异(P=1.000)均无统计学意义;二组患者在随访期内均无复发,总并发症发生率分别为6.7%和9.1%,差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。结论 LIHR在治疗复发性腹股沟疝时与开放式无张力修补术同样安全有效,术式选择取决于前次手术的类型和手术医师的临床经验。

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair(LIHR) for recurrent hernia,and discuss the procedure preferences.Methods From Jan 2008 to Jan 2012,a non-randomized control study was done in the 58 recurrent inguinal hernias,including 27 patients LIHR and 31 patients open mesh repair.All patients were followed up for 2 to 42 months with a median of 18 months.Results There was no significant difference between LIHR and open mesh repair regarding operating time (P=0.072),postoperative hospital stay (P=0.076),visual analogue pain score (P=0.084) and time to return to usual activity (P=1.000).There was no recurrence in two groups and the total incidence rates of postoperative complication were 6.7% and 9.1%,respectively no difference was observed within two groups (P=1.000).Conclusions LIHR and open mesh repair are safe and effective techniques for recurrent inguinal hernia.The choice of method should be based on the last repair type and investigators’ experiences.

  • 【文献出处】 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ,Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2012年04期
  • 【分类号】R656.2
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】66
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络