节点文献

奈达铂与顺铂周方案化疗同步放疗对局部晚期头颈部鳞癌的疗效比较

Nedaplatin and Cisplatin Combined with Radiotherapy in Treatment of Local-advanced Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 谢忆山李长虎戈伟陶卫平

【Author】 XIE Yi-shan,LI Chang-hu,GE Wei,TAO Wei-ping(Second Department of Oncology,Remin Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China)

【机构】 武汉大学人民医院肿瘤二科

【摘要】 目的比较奈达铂(NDP)和顺铂(DDP)每周化学治疗(化疗)方案联合同步放射治疗(放疗)对局部晚期头颈部鳞癌的近期疗效和不良反应。方法局部晚期头颈部鳞癌患者52例,随机分成NDP组和DDP组各26例。NDP组化疗方案:NDP40 mg.(m2)-1静脉滴注,每周1次;DDP组化疗方案:DDP40 mg.(m2)-1静脉滴注,每周1次。两组放疗均采用全程调强放疗方案,原发灶剂量(72~74)Gy/33次;颈部转移淋巴结剂量(66~70)Gy/33次;颈部预防照射剂量(50~56)Gy/28次。结果 NDP组和DDP组有效率分别为92.3%,88.5%(P>0.05);呕吐发生率分别为65.4%,92.3%(P<0.05);中性粒细胞下降发生率分别为73.1%,88.5%(P>0.05);血红蛋白下降发生率分别为65.4%,73.1%(P>0.05);血小板下降发生率分别为92.3%,50.0%(P<0.05)。结论 NDP周方案化疗同步放疗治疗局部晚期头颈部鳞癌的近期疗效与DDP相近,但NDP胃肠道不良反应较少,患者耐受性较好。

【Abstract】 Objective To study the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemotherapy[nedaplatin(NDP) and cisplatin(DDP)] and radiotherapy in the treatment of local-advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma.Methods A total of 52 patients with local-advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma were randomized into NDP group(n=26) and the DDP group(n=26).The two groups of patients received five courses of chemotherapy during their radiotherapy.Chemotherapy regimens were as follows: NDP 40 mg·(m2)-1 once a week and DDP 40 mg·(m2)-1 once a week.Radiotherapy was as follow: all patients received intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT).The doses of radiation on primary tumor and lymphatic gland were(72-74) Gy/33f and(66-70) Gy/33f,respectively.The prophylactic dose of neck was(50-56) Gy/28f.Results The effective rate of NDP and DDP was 92.3% and 88.5%,respectively(P>0.05).Vomiting rate was significantly lower in NDP group(65.4%) than DDP group(92.3%)(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of leukopenia(73.1% vs.88.5%) and reaction rate of hemoglopenia(65.4% vs.73.1%).There was a significantly higher incidence rate of thrombocytopenia in NDP group(92.3%) than in DDP group(50.0%)(P<0.05).Conclusion There is no significant difference between NDP and DDP regimens,and the NDP group has a lower digestive reaction rate than DDP group.The main adverse reaction of NDP regimens is myelosuppression,especially thrombocytopenia.

  • 【文献出处】 医药导报 ,Herald of Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2012年12期
  • 【分类号】R739.91
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】85
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络