【摘要】 目的獉獉:研究中文版尼古丁依赖检测量表(FTND)在吸烟美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)门诊患者中使用的信效度。方法獉獉:在深圳市三家MMT门诊选取217位吸烟MMT门诊患者自评完成一般情况问卷、FTND量表和Russell吸烟原因问卷(RRSQ);间隔2周后对其中60名患者进行FTND量表重测;采用信度分析、相关分析和因子分析评价量表的信效度。结果獉獉:FTND量表的Cronbachα系数为0.638,两周重测信度系数为0.797(P<0.01);FTND量表总分与RRSQ依赖分和每日吸烟量的校标关联效度系数分别为0.404和0.637(P均<0.01);因子分析提取了两个公因子,累积解释总变异的55.039%。结论獉獉:中文版FTND量表在吸烟MMT患者中具有较好的重测信度、校标关联效度和结构效度,但其内部一致性未达心理测量学要求,需要进一步修订。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective: To determine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence(FTND) scale among cigarette smokers from methadone maintenance treatment(MMT) outpatient clinics.Methods:Two hundred and seventeen smoking MMT outpatients were selected from three MMT outpatient clinics in Shenzhen and administered with the Social-demographic Questionnaire,FTND scale and Russell’s Reasons for Smoking Questionnaire(RRSQ);Sixty subjects were re-assessed with FTND scale after two-week interval;Reliability,correlation and factor analyses were used to examine the reliability and validity.Results:The Cronbach α and two-week re-test reliability coefficients of FTND scale were 0.638 and 0.797(P<0.01);The criterion related validity coefficients with dependence score of RRSQ and daily cigarette consumption were 0.404 and 0.637(P<0.01);Two common factors were extracted from FTND scale factor analysis,accounting for 55.039% of the total variance in this scale.Conclusion:The Chinese version of FTND scale has good re-test reliability,criterion related validity and construct validity,but its internal consistency is unsatisfactory in psychometrics and needs further revision.更多还原