节点文献

涪江流域丘陵区不同植被类型水源涵养功能

Water Conservation Capacity of Five Main Forest in the Hilly Area of Fujiang River Basin

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 吴庆贵邹利娟吴福忠杨万勤张素兰

【Author】 WU Qing-gui1,2,ZOU Li-juan2,WU Fu-zhong1,YANG Wan-qin1,ZHANG Su-lan2(1.Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering,Institute of Ecology & Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University,Chengdu 611130;2.Ecological Security and Protection Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,Mianyang Normal University,Mianyang,Sichuan 621000)

【机构】 四川农业大学生态林业研究所/林业生态工程省级重点实验室绵阳师范学院生态安全与保护四川省重点实验室

【摘要】 采用野外调查和水浸法,研究涪江流域丘陵地区5种典型植被系统的雨水截留能力、凋落物蓄积量和持水能力、土壤物理特性、蓄水能力和渗透性能,并基于坐标综合评定法对不同植被类型的水源涵养和保土功能进行综合评价。各植被类型降雨截留量、凋落物蓄积量和持水量均以阔叶灌丛最高,草地最低,阔叶灌丛的平均截留量、凋落物蓄积量和持水量分别为草地的4.9,2.9,1.8倍。不同植被类型的土壤容重和孔隙度差异较大,容重表现为草地>针叶林>针阔混交林>常绿阔叶林>阔叶灌丛;总孔隙度为阔叶灌丛>常绿阔叶林>针阔混交林>针叶林>草地。土壤渗透速率和贮水能力随土壤深度增加而降低,以阔叶灌丛最高,其次为常绿阔叶林、针阔混交林、针叶林,草地贮水能力最弱。5种植被类型水源涵养能力依次为阔叶灌丛>常绿阔叶林>针阔混交林>针叶林>草地,阔叶灌丛明显优于其他植被类型。

【Abstract】 The canopy interception,litter stock and water holding capacity,soil physical properties,soil storage capacity and permeability in grassland,broad-leaved shrub,evergreen broadleaved forest,evergreen broadleaved and coniferous mixed forest,and coniferous forest were studied in the Fujiang river basin by field survey and water immersion methods.The broadleaved shrub had the highest canopy interception,litter water-holding capacity and litter volume,while the grassland showed the opposite.The average value of canopy interception,litter water-holding capacity and litter volume of the broad-leaved shrub were about 4.9,2.9,1.8 times than that of the grassland.Moreover,there were obvious differences in soil bulk density and soil porosity in the different vegetation types.The ranked order of soil bulk density was grassland >coniferous forest >evergreen broadleaved and coniferous mixed forest >evergreen broadleaved forest >broadleaved shrub,whereas the total soil porosity showed the opposite trend.In addition,the storage capacity and permeability of soil decreased with the increase of soil depth.The ranked order of the storage capacity and permeability was broadleaved shrub >evergreen broadleaved forest >evergreen broadleaved and coniferous mixed forest >coniferous forest >grassland.The coordinate composite evaluation indicated that water conservation capacity was broad-leaved shrub >evergreen broadleaved forest >evergreen broadleaved and coniferous mixed forest >coniferous forest >grassland.

【基金】 国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAC09B05);四川省科技支撑计划项目(2010NZ0051,12ZC0017,10ZC0532);四川省教育厅科技创新团队项目(11TD006);四川省教育厅项目(08ZA168,10ZB048)
  • 【文献出处】 水土保持学报 ,Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 编辑部邮箱 ,2012年06期
  • 【分类号】S714
  • 【被引频次】43
  • 【下载频次】539
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络