【摘要】 刑事诉讼利益冲突,必然会付出不愉快的代价。程序正义对于利益冲突之解决,肯定了个体利益之优位价值,成为利益冲突之公认法则。通过比较程序正义之两种不同利益观,揭示英美法系与大陆法系不同利益观之下,程序正义构造之不同。无论何种程序正义利益观,都要付出一定的代价。理性地认识程序正义之利益局限,才能理解无论是追究犯罪,抑或保障人权之裁判,其最终的胜利者,乃是国家之法治。更多还原

【Abstract】 Criminal conflict of interest is bound to pay the unpleasant cost.Procedural justice for resolution of conflict of interest ensures the value of the individual interests of the excellent position,which has been recognized as conflict of interest rules.By comparing the two different interests of procedural justice concept,the author tries to reveal different construction of procedural justice under the different interests of common law and civil law.No matter what kind of procedural justice and interests,a certain price has to be paid.Rational understanding of the limitations of the interests of procedural justice helps to understand whether it is accountability for crimes,or the protection of human rights referee,it is the state of the rule of law that is the ultimate winner.更多还原