【摘要】 涉外民事交往中,物权法定原则要求物权必须适用物之所在地法律,不得由当事人约定准据法。然而我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第37条规定,动产物权可以由当事人协议选择准据法。这种不加任何限制的意思自治原则违背了我国《物权法》上所规定的物权法定原则。这不仅与国外立法和司法实践所体现出来的趋势相背离,也不利于维护我国涉外民事交往中当事人的交易安全和国家安全。更多还原

【Abstract】 In foreign-related civil relations,according to the principle of numerus clauses real rights should be subject to lex rei sitae,not the law which is appointed by the parties in advance.However,article 37 of the Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of the People’s Republic of China allows the parties to appoint the law to govern their legal relationship of movable property.This provision of party autonomy without any limitation,which not only is deviated from the trend reflected in foreign legislation and judicial practice,but also is harmful to the safeguard of parties’ exchange security and the state security in our foreign-related civil relations,breaks the principle of numerus clauses provided in Real Right Law of the People’s Republic of China.更多还原