节点文献

经自然腔道肿物取出的腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与开腹直肠癌根治术的疗效比较

Comparison of Laparoscopic Anterior Resection with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction and Open Resection for Rectal Cancer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 蒋晖费伯健史俊峰

【Author】 JIANG Hui FEI Bojian SHI Junfeng Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,Wuxi 214062,China

【机构】 苏州大学医学院附属第四医院胃肠腔镜外科

【摘要】 目的:比较经自然腔道取出肿物的腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与开腹直肠癌根治术的疗效。方法:回顾分析2007年6月—2009年6月46例直肠癌患者的临床资料。根据手术方式,将46例直肠根治术分为经自然腔道取出肿物的腹腔镜手术组(n=16)及开腹手术组(n=30)。对两组手术的安全性、根治性及患者术后的恢复情况行比较。结果:两组患者的直肠肿瘤直径、切缘、肿瘤分期与清扫淋巴结数目相仿。腹腔镜手术组手术时间长,住院时间短,与传统开腹手术组相比差异有统计学意义;术中出血量及手术并发症发生率两组无明显差异。结论:经自然腔道取出肿物的腹腔镜直肠癌根治术安全可行。

【Abstract】 Objective:To compare the outcome of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction and open resection for rectal cancer.Methods:From June 2007 to June 2009,46 patients with rectal cancer have been enrolled.Among them 16 cases underwent laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction,and 30 cases underwent open resection.The operative time,blood loss,hospital stay and rates of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results: There was no statistical difference in tumor size,surgical distal margin,tumor stage and numbers of resected lymph nodes between the two groups.The operative time was longer and hospital stay was shorter in laparoscopic resection group(P<0.05).The blood loss in surgery and the rates of postoperative complications were similar between the two groups.Conclusions: Laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction is a safe and mini-invasive approach for rectal cancer.

【关键词】 腹腔镜直肠癌自然腔道剖腹术
【Key words】 LaparoscopyRectal neoplasmsNatural orificeLaparotomy
  • 【文献出处】 中国临床医学 ,Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2012年06期
  • 【分类号】R735.37
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】94
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络