【摘要】 依据我国《物权法》第74条及《最高人民法院关于审理建筑物区分所有权纠纷案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称《法释》)之有关条款,均无法判断建筑物区分所有权语境下的停车位归属。民法学说上常见的可能影响停车位归属的九个因素,可以类型化为行政判断说、约定归属说、投资受益说和空间关系说,但其中只有空间关系说具有合理性。比确认停车位归属更有现实意义的是对于处分停车位的限制,此种限制应遵循"对外优先,对内平等"原则。此外,基于规避土地增值税目的由开发商向税务机关做出的有关声明,不应作为判断停车位归属的根据。停车位使用权转让协议也不宜简单认定为无效。更多还原

【Abstract】 According to Article 74 of Property Law of People’s Republic of China and it’s judicial interpretation,we are unable to determine the ownership of parking spaces in a building under the concept of Common and Respective Ownership.There are nine factors that may affect judgment of ownership of parking spaces in civil law doctrine.These factors can be categorized into Administrative Judgment Doctrine,Ownership on Agreement Doctrine,Investment Benefit Doctrine,and Spatial Relationships Doctrine.But only Spatial Relationships Doctrine is more reasonable,compared with other doctrines.However,restriction on the disposal right on parking spaces is important than the ownership of parking spaces in practice.The restrictions shall follow the principle of Queuing Theory.更多还原