节点文献

癌症疲乏量表中文版的信效度

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Cancer Fatigue Scale

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张凤玲丁玥韩丽沙

【Author】 ZHANG Feng-Ling1,DING Yue2,HAN Li-Sha3 1Nursing Department,Wannan Medical College,Wuhu 241000,Anhui Province,China 2Nursing Department,Beijing Cancer Hospital,Beijing Institute for Cancer Research,Peking University School of Oncology,Beijing 100036,China 3School of Nursing,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China

【机构】 安徽省芜湖市皖南医学院护理学系北京大学肿瘤医院护理部北京中医药大学护理学院

【摘要】 目的:分析癌症疲乏量表(CFS)中文版的信度和效度。方法:通过正向翻译、综合、回译、专家评议和预调查5个步骤对CFS进行跨文化调适,修订成中文版。采用方便取样,对187名癌症患者施测CFS中文版进行项目分析、内部一致性检验、探索性因素分析和癌因性疲乏总体状况分析。1周后对其中42名患者重测CFS中文版,评价重测信度。结果:量表共15个条目,包括躯体、情感和认知3个维度。各维度与总量表的内部一致性Cronbachα系数在0.63~0.86,重测信度为0.55~0.77。探索性因素分析得到3个因素,共解释了59.04%的累计方差贡献率,各条目载荷均>0.40。结论:癌症疲乏量表中文版具有较好的信度和效度,符合心理测量学要求。

【Abstract】 Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Cancer Fatigue Scale(CFS).Methods: After the translation,synthesis,back translation,expert committee review,and pretesting processes,the CFS was revised into a Chinese version(CFS-C).Totally 200 Chinese cancer patients completed CFS-C initally and 42 of them were investigated a week later to evaluate the test-retest reliability.Results:The CFS-C comprised 15 items and reflected 3 dimentions of physical,emotional and cognitive fatigue.The internal consistency reliability evaluated by Cronbach’ a was 0.63-0.86 for the three subscales and the whole scale.The test-retest reliability was from 0.55 to 0.77.Factor analysis displayed good construction of the CFS-C.Conclusion: The Chinese version of Cancer Fatigue Scale(CFS) has good reliability and validity,meeting psychometric criteria.

【关键词】 癌因性疲乏信度效度心理测量学
【Key words】 cancer-related fatiguereliabilityvaliditypsychometrics
  • 【文献出处】 中国心理卫生杂志 ,Chinese Mental Health Journal , 编辑部邮箱 ,2011年11期
  • 【分类号】R73-31
  • 【被引频次】208
  • 【下载频次】1468
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络