节点文献
一个自然主义者的非自然的批判——论蒯因批判分析-综合陈述区分的合理性
A Naturalist’s Unnatural Criticism——On Quine’s Rationality of Critiquing Distinction between Analytic and Synthetic Statements
【摘要】 分析陈述和综合陈述的区分是现代经验论(即逻辑经验主义)哲学立场的理论基础,蒯因在著名的"经验论的两个教条"一文中对分析-综合陈述区分的拒斥,常被看作是对现代经验论主义理论基石的最严重的摧毁。本文对蒯因批判的合理性提出质疑,并通过考量他批判两种陈述区分的真正哲学意图,阐释他的后经验主义哲学的特征。
【Abstract】 The distinction between analytic and synthetic statements is the modern empiricist theoretical basis.Quine’s refusal of the distinction on "Two Dogmas is Empiricism" is regarded as the most serious destruction to the modern empiricist theoretical basis.This paper calls in question the rationality of Quine’s criticism,and also interprets the characteristics of his post-empiricism through reflecting the really philosophical intention of his criticism.
【关键词】 分析-综合陈述;
同义性;
意义公设;
整体论;
认识论的自然化;
【Key words】 Analytic-synthetic statements; Synonymy; Meaning postulates; Holism; Espitemology naturalized;
【Key words】 Analytic-synthetic statements; Synonymy; Meaning postulates; Holism; Espitemology naturalized;
【基金】 国家社会科学基金项目(10BZX021);武汉大学科研项目(113275925)
- 【文献出处】 自然辩证法通讯 ,Journal of Dialectics of Nature , 编辑部邮箱 ,2011年03期
- 【分类号】N02
- 【被引频次】5
- 【下载频次】373