【摘要】 "法律保留"理论关乎民主和法治诉求的实现,随着宪政国家框架下对基本权利的认识,其转变为围绕基本权利保护而展开的权力正当性探索。德国联邦宪法法院的"重要性理论"推进了一种围绕着基本权利保护但又与机构功能相符的权能分配的考量可能。但"重要性理论"的区分标准缺少清楚性和可预期性,这一致命的理论弱点,导致它最终成为了空白公式。"重要的"这个概念没能真正实现法教义学之目的,只能作为法律实践中有启发性的概念。更多还原

【Abstract】 Along with the understanding of basic rights under the constitutionalism framework,law reservation,which directly touches the realization of democracy and rule of law,transforms into legitimacy exploration towards power concerning basic rights protection.The materiality theory developed by the German federal constitutional court provides the consideration possibility of a type of power distribution which not only centers basic rights protection but also matches the organizational functions.Nonetheless,the lack of clearness and predictability in its distinction standard,a fatal weakness,leads the materiality theory to empty verbiage at the end that it only remains the edification to practice but no law dogmatic related significance.更多还原