【摘要】 《侵权责任法》第46条确立了我国产品的后续观察义务。这一制度的确立符合社会安全和公平正义的理念。然而,由于缺乏相关的解释,该条在适用中将与产品质量法中的发展缺陷免责条款存在冲突,第46条可以认为是对发展缺陷免责条款的修正。另外,违背后续观察义务所产生之产品责任应遵循无过错责任原则,侵权责任范围不应包括惩罚性赔偿。更多还原

【Abstract】 Fallow-up observation,a duty imposed on sold products by Art.46 of the Tort Claims Act of the People’s Republic of China,is consistent with the notion of maintenance of society safety and ascertaining fairness and justice.However,for lack of proper interpretation,it may conflict with the development defect exemption clause in the Product Quality Act while Art.46 may be deemed an alteration to the exemption clause.In addition,the product liability resulted from breach of follow-up observation should be held as strict liability while no punitive damages are available.更多还原