【摘要】 我国《侵权责任法》专章(第七章)规定了医疗侵权,其中第54条确立了过错责任原则,并通过第58条明确列举了推定医疗机构存在过错的三种情形,这在很大程度上改变了《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》中由医疗机构就医疗行为与损害结果之间不存在因果关系和不存在医疗过错承担举证责任的做法,亦与我国《医疗事故处理办法》、《医疗事故处理条例》中完全由患者承担医疗机构存在过错的举证模式不同,这一模式变迁反映了立法机关在不同历史时期对社会的价值取向做出了适时调整,不仅促进了医患关系的和谐,而且契合了当前社会的发展。更多还原

【Abstract】 The medical tort is stipulated in an independent chapter of《Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China》,fault liability principle is adopted in the Section 54 of the law,and by means of Section 58 of the law stipulates three situations on presumption of fault.So this model greatly changes the methods of inexistence causality—medical behaviour and damage result,and of assume burden of proof in inexistence medical fault what they had stipulated in former《judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court in China.》 and the model is also different from method of completely assume burden of proof by patients what it had stipulated in《The Measures for Handling Malpractices 》 and 《The Rules for Handling Malpractices 》 in our country.In fact,the adjustment of the models on burden of proof reflect the legislature’s value orientation was adjusted in different historical periods,which can promote the harmony between patients and medical institutions and agree with the development of current society.更多还原