【摘要】 帕洛夫《极端的诗歌艺术》揭示当代诗歌创作特点,从结构方法的角度构建多媒体时代的诗学。现锁定该书的第五章"(数)之崛起",以帕洛夫另一本文集《诗的破格》中第四章"数的求索"为主要参考,试图厘清数学方法的理念。论述分四个部分:第一部分梳理数学方法的演变,追踪数字之于诗歌创作的客观意义、形式意义、象征意义、结构意义,论述以数学方法创作对诗篇语言、结构的影响,讨论数学方法与传统创作方法的联系与不同,指出数学方法结构诗篇的规约性、修辞性、游戏性。第二部分在自由诗发展变异的背景中理解数学方法产生,标出数学方法的理论基础。第三部分比较数学方法与中国传统诗文机巧的相通之处,认为数学方法在单音节且不受语法变位影响的汉语言中有更理想的生存空间。第四部分就数学方法的前景和普及性提出一些疑问。更多还原

【Abstract】 Radical Artifice explicates contemporary poetry writing and promotes new poetics in an age of media. Focusing on "The Return of the (Numerical) Repressed" and in reference to "The Pursuit of Numbers: Yeats, Khlebnikov, and Mathematics of Modernism" of Poetic License by the same author, I set out to foreground Perloff’s mathematic theory in literary writing. Observation and comments come in four parts. Part I highlights numerical values (objective, formal, symbolic and structural) in literary writings and map the development of mathematic method as discussed by Perloff. My observation is that mathematic method sometimes affects poems’ language, structure and outlook, and sometimes not. Another finding is that mathematic method is connected to traditional poetics and has its own characteristic in constraints, rhetoric, and procedural play. Part II attempts to understand the mathematic method in the context of free verse development and deterioration. This part also marks the theoretical grounding of the mathematic poetics. Part III is a comparison between mathematic method and similar artifice in traditional Chinese literary writing. I argue that mathematic method is better reflected in and more applicable to Chinese writing, because Chinese is monosyllabic and involves no grammatical inflexion. Part IV concerns the prospect and popularity of mathematic method in literary writing.更多还原