节点文献

应对方式及社会家庭支持对焦虑症患者影响的相关研究

Study of coping modes and social-family support’s effect on the anxiety disorder

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 宋燕吴逸明吕梅伍毅

【Author】 SONG Yan,WU Yiming,LU Mei,et al.Yangpu Mental Health Center,Shanghai 200090,China

【机构】 上海市杨浦区精神卫生中心

【摘要】 目的调查心理咨询门诊中焦虑症患者应激事件中的应对方式及社会家庭支持,并探讨应对模式及心理支持对焦虑症患者的影响。方法采用病例对照的研究方法,对焦虑症组及正常对照组采用特质应对方式问卷,家庭亲密度与适应性量表,社会支持量表评估。运用非参数t检验Spearman相关分析。结果消极应对方式与焦虑症呈显著正相关(P<0.01);积极应对与焦虑症呈显著负相关。正常人群与焦虑症的社会,家庭支持异同(P<0.05)。男性与女性焦虑症患者应对方式有显著差异(P<0.01)。社会支持中男性患者与女性患者有显著差异(P<0.01)。应对方式,社会支持及家庭亲密度适应性三者明显相关。结论应对模式,社会支持及家庭亲密度适应性对于个体的心理健康及心理应激至关重要。

【Abstract】 Objective The investigating of the anxiety disorder’s coping modes to the stress event and their social-family support in the psychological consultation clinic to discuss the coping mode and the psychological support effect the anxiety disorders.Methods This study adopted case-control method,investigation the groups and normal controls by questionnaire and scale survey.Investigation contents include questionnaires of idiosyncratic coping styles,family intimate degree and adaptability scale,social support scale of social and family support evaluation.Using non-parameter test Spearman correlation analysis and Logistic regression analysis.Results Negative coping styles are significantly positive correlation with anxiety disorders(P<0.01);Actively coping styles are significantly negative correlation with anxiety disorders.The anxiety disorder’s social-family support is different from the normal controls (P<0.05).The coping style is also different in the gender(P<0.01).Also their social support is different (P<0.01).Coping styles,social support and family intimate degree have significantly correlation.Conclusion Coping modes,social support and family intimate degree are very important to individual mental health and mental stress.

  • 【文献出处】 四川精神卫生 ,Sichuan Mental Health , 编辑部邮箱 ,2011年03期
  • 【分类号】R749.72
  • 【被引频次】12
  • 【下载频次】167
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络