【摘要】 研究中国古代文学,必须以史料为基础。史料的新发现,特别是地下文物史料的发现,丰富、拓展了文学史料,能够修正、补充甚至改变以前研究的结论,影响学术理念和研究方法,导致新的学科的形成,有助于文学史料的训诂。文学史料是文学史研究的基础,但不能把文学史料同文学史研究等同起来。历史的真相很难保存。现存的史料同历史实际相比,是局部的、片断的,存在着固有的偏向。人们在研究文学史时,不会停止在史料上,主观的介入是自然的,是不可避免的。史料是有限的,人们对史料的认识是无限的。某些新的理论和方法的出现和运用,往往能直接影响对某些史料的搜集和整理。在文学史研究中,我们应当承认和重视研究者主观的作用,正确地体悟分析和评价史料,同史料本身有同构性和统一性。不以史料为基础,就会轻易地陷入意图哲学和相对主义。更多还原

【Abstract】 Studies on ancient Chinese literature must be based on historical materials.The discovery of new historical materials,especially the newly excavated underground cultural documents or evidences,could enrich literary materials and supplement or even rectify the conclusions of existing studies.Moreover,they could also reshape the academic ideas and research methods and ultimately lead to the birth of new subjects and contribute to the critical interpretation of ancient literary texts.Historical literary materials should serve as the basis of the study of literary history.However,we should not equate historical literary materials with the study of literary history.Historical facts can hardly be preserved.Compared to the historical truth,extant historical materials are partial,fragmentary and featuring inherent bias.In addition,researchers will inevitably bring their subjective judgments into their interpretation of historical literary materials.Historical materials are limited,but their interpretation is unlimited.The appearance and application of some new theories and methods could directly influence the collection and processing of historical materials.In the study of the literary history,we should recognize and value the subjectivity of the researchers.The interpretation and assessment of the historical materials should be strictly based on and kept in unity with the historical materials themselves.Failing to be firmly based on historical materials,researches will easily fall into the trap of intentional philosophy and relativism.更多还原