节点文献

基于最值法和百分比法的开发区土地集约利用评价对比研究

Comparative Studies on the Development Areas Evaluation of Land Intensive Use Based on the Most Value Method and the Percentage Method

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 汪永红黄建洲杨升王永豪张丽萍孙倩

【Author】 WANG Yong-hong1,HUANG Jian-zhou1,2,YANG Sheng1,2,WANG Yong-hao1,2,ZHANG Li-ping2,SUN Qian2(1.Gansu Institute of Land Resources Planning and Research,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000;2.Resource and Environment College of Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730070)

【机构】 甘肃省国土资源规划研究院甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院

【摘要】 以甘肃省34个省级开发区为例,通过构建评价指标体系,采用最值化和百分比法,对全省开发区土地集约利用评价进行定量分析。结果表明:最值法能增强评价指标间的显著性,真实反映开发区土地集约利用水平的差异;全省开发区产业用地投入产出效益、土地利用监管绩效较高,土地利用程度、用地结构状况和土地供应市场化程度较合理,但仍有进一步提升的空间;土地利用强度有待进一步提高;评价范围与开发区实际发展范围不一致,导致部分开发区评价结果不能真实反映实际情况。因此,最值法对开发区土地集约利用程度进行系统分析,能真实反映开发区之间的差异。

【Abstract】 Taking 34 provincial-level development zones in Gansu province as an example,a quantitative analysis on the evaluation of province’s intensive land use zone was carried out through building the evaluation index system by the most value method and the percentage method.The results showed that the most value method could enhance the significance of the evaluated indexes and reflect the intensive land use differences truthfully;The province’s industrial land use zone inputs and outputs efficiency were high,as well as land-use supervised performance.Besides,the degree and the structural situation of land use were better.However,it had much room for improvement of land use intensity.The range between evaluation and actual development zone were inconsistent,which lead to the evaluation results not to be a true reflection for actual situation in some zones.So it conclude that the most value method proceeding system analysis to the degree of intensive land use zone could actually reflect the situation of the development zone.

【基金】 国土资源大调查之甘肃省开发区土地集约利用评价汇总资助项目
  • 【文献出处】 黑龙江农业科学 ,Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences , 编辑部邮箱 ,2011年09期
  • 【分类号】F301.2
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】144
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络