节点文献

论量刑建议权的有效行使

The Effective Performance of Power of Proposal for Measurement of Penalty

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杨正万

【Author】 YANG Zheng-wan(Guizhou University for Nationalities,Guizyang 550025,Guizhou Province,P.R.China)

【机构】 贵州民族学院

【摘要】 量刑建议权有效行使以司法分权理论、程序过程理论为其理论依据。在量刑建议权有效行使的标准上存在着两个误区——将审判监督权与量刑建议权行使标准等同和将公诉权中的定罪请求权与量刑请求权的有效行使标准等同。有必要确立有效行使标准的原则,并确立量刑建议权有效行使的宏观标准和微观标准。

【Abstract】 The theoretical basis of the effective performance of power of proposal for measurement of penalty is the theories of judiciary separation and procedural process.There are two misunderstandings of the standards of the effective performance of power of proposal for measurement: equating the performance standards of trial supervision power with the one of the power of proposal for measurement of penalty;equating the effective performance standards of conviction request right in public suit rights with the power of request for measurement of penalty.It’s necessary to define the principle of the effective performance standards,the macro-standards and micro-standards of the effective performance of power of proposal for measurement of penalty.

  • 【文献出处】 贵州警官职业学院学报 ,Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College , 编辑部邮箱 ,2011年03期
  • 【分类号】D925.2
  • 【下载频次】94
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络