【摘要】 我国目前普遍适用于不动产登记纠纷的相关程序性规定未能充分反映林权权属变动和登记纠纷的特殊性,对于解决林权登记纠纷的实际效用不佳。虽然行政救济与司法程序对于林权登记纠纷的解决各具价值与功能,但现阶段应当考虑优先适用行政救济的方式。在司法程序适用上,则应当充分认识民事诉讼与行政诉讼的区别,尊重当事人的选择权;两种诉讼程序相互关联时,应当协调林权登记的"公信力"与"公定力",保护善意第三人的合法权益,并实现纠纷的彻底解决。更多还原

【Abstract】 China’s current procedural rules which applied in the cases about the real estate registration do not reflect the special natures of the disputes on the changes and registration of the forest rights,and make poor actual effect for solving these disputes.Although the administrative remedies and judicial procedures have the different value and function for the settlement of the registration disputes,we should give priority application with administrative remedies at this stage.On the application of the judicial procedures,we should fully understand the difference between civil and administrative litigation,with respect for the parties’ right to choose.When the two kinds of proceedings are associated one another,we should harmonize the "credibility" and "bonding force" of the forest right registration to protect the legitimate interests of bona fide third parties and resolve the disputes completely.更多还原