节点文献

A Comparison of Four Precipitation Distribution Models Used in Daily Stochastic Models

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 刘永和张万昌邵月红张可欣

【Author】 LIU Yonghe1,5,6 , ZHANG Wanchang2 , SHAO Yuehong3 , and ZHANG Kexin4 1Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment Research for Temperate East Asia (RCE-TEA), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029 2Center for Hydrosciences Research, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093 3Applied Hydrometeorological Research Institute, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044 4Linyi Meteorological Bureau, Shandong Province, Linyi 276004 5Institute of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000 6Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

【机构】 Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment Research for Temperate East Asia (RCE-TEA),Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029Institute of Resources and Environment,Henan Polytechnic UniversityGraduate University of Chinese Academy of SciencesCenter for Hydrosciences Research,Nanjing UniversityApplied Hydrometeorological Research Institute,Nanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyLinyi Meteorological Bureau

【摘要】 Stochastic weather generators are statistical models that produce random numbers that resemble the observed weather data on which they have been fitted; they are widely used in meteorological and hydrologi- cal simulations. For modeling daily precipitation in weather generators, first-order Markov chain-dependent exponential, gamma, mixed-exponential, and lognormal distributions can be used. To examine the perfor- mance of these four distributions for precipitation simulation, they were fitted to observed data collected at 10 stations in the watershed of Yishu River. The parameters of these models were estimated using a maximum-likelihood technique performed using genetic algorithms. Parameters for each calendar month and the Fourier series describing parameters for the whole year were estimated separately. Bayesian infor- mation criterion, simulated monthly mean, maximum daily value, and variance were tested and compared to evaluate the fitness and performance of these models. The results indicate that the lognormal and mixed-exponential distributions give smaller BICs, but their stochastic simulations have overestimation and underestimation respectively, while the gamma and exponential distributions give larger BICs, but their stochastic simulations produced monthly mean precipitation very well. When these distributions were fitted using Fourier series, they all underestimated the above statistics for the months of June, July and August.

【Abstract】 Stochastic weather generators are statistical models that produce random numbers that resemble the observed weather data on which they have been fitted; they are widely used in meteorological and hydrologi- cal simulations. For modeling daily precipitation in weather generators, first-order Markov chain–dependent exponential, gamma, mixed-exponential, and lognormal distributions can be used. To examine the perfor- mance of these four distributions for precipitation simulation, they were fitted to observed data collected at 10 stations in the watershed of Yishu River. The parameters of these models were estimated using a maximum-likelihood technique performed using genetic algorithms. Parameters for each calendar month and the Fourier series describing parameters for the whole year were estimated separately. Bayesian infor- mation criterion, simulated monthly mean, maximum daily value, and variance were tested and compared to evaluate the fitness and performance of these models. The results indicate that the lognormal and mixed-exponential distributions give smaller BICs, but their stochastic simulations have overestimation and underestimation respectively, while the gamma and exponential distributions give larger BICs, but their stochastic simulations produced monthly mean precipitation very well. When these distributions were fitted using Fourier series, they all underestimated the above statistics for the months of June, July and August.

【基金】 supported by the National Key Developing Program for Basic Sciences of China (GrantNo. 2010CB951404);Chinese Nature Science Foundation(Grant No. 40971024);the Special Meteorology Project[GYHY(QX)2007-6-1]
  • 【文献出处】 Advances in Atmospheric Sciences ,大气科学进展(英文版) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2011年04期
  • 【分类号】P426.6
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】67
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络