节点文献

安全化的路径分析——以中海油竞购优尼科案为例

A Path Analysis of Securitization: The Example of CNOOC’s Bid for Unocal

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王凌

【Author】 Wang Ling is a PhD Student in the School of International Relations and Public Affairs of Fudan University

【机构】 复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院

【摘要】 哥本哈根学派为安全研究提供了一种社会建构主义的研究方法。安全化理论的核心概念"言语-行为"表明,安全表达本身造就安全问题;安全的"主体间性"决定了安全化是一个建构对威胁认知的过程。因此一个完整的安全化路径应该包括:(1)安全化启动:拥有相应的话语权或社会资源的安全化主体通过"言语-行为"指涉某物为威胁;(2)安全化传播:媒体通过议程设置和框架效应两大功能说服听众共享安全认知;(3)塑造安全受众,使特定议题安全化。本文通过对中海油竞购优尼科案被安全化的过程分析说明安全化是一个话语实践过程;作为安全化主体的美国国会建构了一个安全化逻辑,媒体作为话语载体则传播了国家安全的框架并塑造了公众认知从而使该案被安全化。

【Abstract】 The Copenhagen school of thought offers a research methodology for security studies rooted in social constructivism.The central concept of securitization theory——"speech-behavior"——illustrates that security statements in and of themselves can create security problems;the subjectivity of security means that securitization is a process of constructing recognition of a threat.As such,the complete path that securitization follows includes:(1) Initiation of securitization: a securitizing actor with sufficient voice or social capital uses a statement or act to refer to or point out a threat;(2) Securitizing Media: through its structuring of the agenda and framing effects,the media convinces its audience of a shared security awareness;(3) a security audience is constructed,and an issue is securitized.Based on an analysis of CNOOC’s bid to purchase Unocal,this article shows that securitization is a discursive process: Congress functioned as a securitizing actor to construct a logic of securitization;the media then framed this logic in terms of national security;this shaped public perception thereby securitizing the deal.

  • 【文献出处】 当代亚太 ,Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies , 编辑部邮箱 ,2011年05期
  • 【分类号】F426.22
  • 【被引频次】22
  • 【下载频次】776
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络