【摘要】 目的利用免疫组织化学技术检测肌细胞膜上Dystrophin蛋白表达是鉴别诊断Duchenne型和Becker型肌营养不良(DMD和BMD)的病理学基础,然而个别病例的肌细胞膜上Dystrophin蛋白表达几乎接近于正常,这给临床疑似BMD诊断带来一定困难。本研究探讨神经源性一氧化氮合酶(nNOS)对BMD患者的诊断价值。方法对Dys-C端结构域表达呈阳性的5例BMD(其中已临床明确诊断3例,临床疑似2例)和作为对照的骨折患儿肌肉组织,利用免疫组织化学的方法行单克隆Dytrophin抗体和nNOS抗体染色。结果与对照组比较,已临床明确诊断BMD 3例病例的肌细胞膜上Dys-C、Dys-R和Dys-N端结构域蛋白均有显著缺乏,nNOS均未见表达;临床疑似2例BMD病例的肌细胞膜上,即使Dystrophin蛋白接近于正常表达,但nNOS在肌细胞膜上是缺乏的。结论对Dystrophinn三端结构域蛋白接近于正常表达的临床疑似BMD患儿,可通过nNOS抗体染色达到明确诊断的目的。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective Immunohistochemistry using antibodies to dystrophin is the pathological basis for the differential diagnosis of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy(DMD and BMD).In rare cases,however,labelling dystrophin on sarcolemma is equivocal and similar to that observed in controls.This makes the diagnosis of BMD difficult.This study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of neuronal nitric oxide synthase(nNOS) antibody for clinically suspected BMD.Methods Immunohistochemical staining was performed on muscle specimens of 5 cases of BMD with positive expression of Dys-C(3 cases had a confirmed diagnosis of BMD,2 cases were clinically suspected as BMD) by using dystrophin and nNOS antibodies.Normal muscle specimens from the children with fracture were used as controls.Results Compared with the controls,the expression of Dys-R,Dys-C and Dys-N was markedly reduced and nNOS was not expressed on sarcolemma in the three cases of definitely diagnosed BMD.The two cases of clinically suspected as BMD had a complete absence of sarcolemmal nNOS,even if had a similar expression of dystrophin on sarcolemma to the controls.Conclusions nNOS antibody staining can be used for a definite diagnosis in children with clinically suspected BMD who have the almost normal expression of dystrophin.更多还原