节点文献

关于科技期刊编辑质量考核的思考

Thinking of assessment of editing quality of scientific journals

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 黄政郝希春

【Author】 HUANG Zheng,HAO Xichun Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy,232001,Huainan,Anhui,China

【机构】 中国基层医药杂志社

【摘要】 科技期刊编辑质量直接影响刊物的整体质量。而在考核科技期刊的编辑质量时,SCI情结很易导致原本客观公正的评价指标失去其实际评价功能和意义。正因为科技期刊编辑的贡献更多地表现为隐性成绩,对特殊性和复杂性极为明显的科技期刊编辑质量考评在理论上和实践中都有待不断深化。

【Abstract】 The editing quality directly affects the overall quality of scientific journals.The quality of editors and the quality of papers in the journals are golden standards for the assessment.Therefore,publishing high quality journals requires scientists to become editors.In assessing the editing quality of scientific journals,the motivation of being indexed in SCI will easily make the originally objective and fair assessment indicators lose their practical functions.Because in many cases the contribution of the editors looks like some recessive achievements,so for the editing quality of scientific journals which is very particular and complicated,its assessment needs more theoretical studies and real practices.

  • 【分类号】G238
  • 【被引频次】17
  • 【下载频次】305
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络