节点文献

机械安全性评估方法研究

Research on Mechanical Safety Capability Assessment Methods

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈文瑛吴穹王勇毅

【Author】 CHEN Wen-ying1,2,Lecturer WU Qiong3,Prof. WANG Yong-yi2,Assoc. Prof.(1 State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science & Technology,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081, China 2 School of Safety & Environmental Engineering, Capital University of Economics & Business, Beijing 100026, China 3 School of Civil Aviation & Safety Engineering, Shenyang Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, Shenyang 110136, China)

【机构】 北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室首都经济贸易大学安全与环境工程学院沈阳航空工业学院民航与安全工程学院

【摘要】 针对目前机械安全和机械安全性概念模糊不清的问题,阐述机械安全、机械安全性及可靠性相关概念的区别,并进一步分析现有的机械安全性定性、定量及其他评估方法各自的优缺点,并最终得出结论:目前机械安全性定性评价主观性较强、定量评价部件多态性、非单调性、共因失效问题没有解决以及部件关键度计算过程复杂、不利于工程人员直接应用。针对存在的问题,最后给出了机械安全性定性评估模型和定量评估模型的设计方案。

【Abstract】 Considering the mix-up of the definition of machine safety and machine safety-capability, the differences among machine safety, machine safety-capability and reliability are discussed. Then the advantages and disadvantages of present qualitative, quantitative and other methods for machine safety-capability assessment are analyzed. It is concluded that the qualitative assessment methods for machine safety-capability have a high subjectivity, and quantitative assessment methods can not solve component’s multi-state, non-monotonic and common cause failure problems, meanwhile, the calculation of criticality degree of components is complicated and is difficult for engineers to apply directly. Finally, design plans for machine safety-capability qualitative and quantitative assessment model are provided to settle those problems.

  • 【文献出处】 中国安全科学学报 ,China Safety Science Journal(CSSJ) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2010年01期
  • 【分类号】X941
  • 【被引频次】26
  • 【下载频次】780
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络