【摘要】 美国政府一贯标榜其反倾销法的宗旨是反对不公平贸易,保护美国人民的福利。但是,通过分析美国反倾销法规制的三种行为——掠夺性定价、歧视性定价和低于成本定价的起因、合理性和可行性,以及经济福利效果,不难发现,美国反倾销法的规制行为与其立法宗旨相矛盾,即美国反倾销法禁止并处罚的,是几乎不可能发生的行为,或有利于增进美国整体经济福利的行为,而后者在大多数情况下与"不公正贸易"无关。更多还原

【Abstract】 The US always claim their legislative aims of antidumping laws as protecting welfare of US people and fighting against "unfair trade".This article analyzes the reasons,reasonability,flexibility and economic welfare effects of three pricing behaviors regulated by US antidumping laws-predatory pricing,price discrimination and selling below cost,and concludes that the regulations conflicts with their legislative aims,because what the US antidumping laws prohibit and punish are pricing with little possibility to occur,or that to increase the whole economic welfare of US,and the latter is not involved with "unfair trade" in most cases.更多还原