【摘要】 《史记》和《汉书》并称为我国史学的双璧,司马迁与班固的比较是传统史学批评中的重要问题,而且至今仍是学界研究的重点。《史记》问世之初被目为"谤书",统治阶级限制甚至阻碍《史记》的传播;而《汉书》撰成之后,"当世甚重其书,学者莫不讽诵焉",随之展开两部史书的优劣比较。历经汉魏六朝,到隋朝时,《史记》与《汉书》同样被列入封建正史,实现了班马优劣并称。但是,目前班马比较的权威说法是"扬班抑马为唐前班马比较的主流倾向,班马抑扬相当出现于宋明时期"。如果运用接受美学理论,从读者的角度梳理班马比较这一问题在唐前发展演变的轨迹,我们会发现班马优劣并称出现在南北朝而非宋明时期,"扬班抑马"只是东汉时期的主流倾向。更多还原

【Abstract】 The comparison of SHI JI and HAN SHU has been an important research subject in the traditional history criticism.When SHI JI was finished,the ruling class regarded it as "the libelous book" and restricted its spreading.After HAN SHU published,the authority paid great attention on it and made it be read everywhere,and at the same time the comparisons between them was launched.From the Dynasties of Han,through Wei,Jin and Nan Bei,till Sui,SHI JI and HAN SHU were similarly included into the feudal historical classics and got the equal positions.This paper argues if according to the accepted aesthetic theory and from readers’ perspective,we come to conclusion the getting of the equal position of the two classics appeared in the Dynasty of Nan Bei,but not Song and Ming Dynasties.Then it refutes the saying which praised HAN SHU and depreciated SHI JI were before Tang Dynasty and the getting of equal position appeared in Song and Ming Dynasties.更多还原