【摘要】 通过语义辨析来尝试澄清"部门法哲学"概念的混乱状况,可以建议使用"法律科学"与"法律哲学"这对界定比较清晰的范畴来讨论问题。"法律科学"是指"探究法律现象的普遍规律和普遍解释的思想活动",作为"法律科学"的下位概念,可以区分"一般法律科学"和"特殊(领域的)法律科学";"法律哲学"是指"以法律思想本身为对象的反思和批判活动",它们都探究"法律是什么"这个根本性问题。"部门法哲学"就是指"以特殊领域的法律思想为对象的反思和批判活动"。造成"部门法哲学"概念混乱基于两个虚假前提,即"混淆知识成果和思想活动"以及"学科分立天然正当"。更多还原

【Abstract】 It can be suggested that making use of legal science and legal philosophy both of which are clearly-defined categories discusses problems in order to try to clarify the mess about the concept of applied legal philosophy through semantic analysis. Legal science indicates the thinking activities which research into the universal rules and interpretations of legal phenomena. General legal science and particular legal science can be differentiated as the inferior concepts of legal science. Legal philosophy indicates the activities of reflection and criticism targeted to legal thought itself. Both legal science and legal philosophy explore the fundamental problem of what is law. Applied legal philosophy indicates the activities of reflection and criticism targeted to legal thought in particular field. The mess about the concept of applied legal philosophy is based on two false premises,that is,confusing knowledge fruits and thinking activities on the one hand,the natural rationality of subject division on the other hand.更多还原