【摘要】 对比分析了欧洲、瑞典及美国关于商用车驾驶室强度试验要求的国际法规,针对我国采用的现行欧洲法规ECE R29-02中正面摆锤撞击试验及180°滚翻顶盖准静压试验与实际车辆碰撞事故不符之处,解析了现行ECER29-02与其修订案ECE R29-03的差异,并进一步研究分析了修订案ECE R29-03新增加的正面A柱摆锤撞击试验、驾驶室侧面摆锤20°撞击试验。更多还原

【Abstract】 Comparative analysis is made to international regulations concerning commercial vehicle cab strength test requirement in Europe,Sweden and the U.S,and in consideration of the inconformity between frontal pendulum impact test and 180°top cover quasi-static pressure test of the current ECE R29-02 which is in practice in China and the real vehicle collision,the discrepancy between the prevailing ECE R29-02 and ECE R29-03 is interpreted.Two newly added tests including frontal Column-A pendulum impact test,cab side pendulum 20°impact test in ECER29-03 are investigated and analyzed.更多还原