节点文献

四种修复方法对p504s免疫组化染色效果的比较

Comparison of four p540s Immunohistochemical Staining Retrieval Methods

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 余光银蔡广玲赵洋陈耀丽尹为华

【Author】 YU Guang-yin,CAI Guang-ling,ZHAO Yang,CHEN Yao-li,YIN Wei-hua(Department of Pathology,Peking University Shenzhen Hospital,Shenzhen 518036,China)

【机构】 北京大学深圳医院病理科

【摘要】 寻找p504 s免疫组化染色最适合的修复方法,以达到最佳染色效果。收集60例前列腺癌切片,分别对其进行EDTA修复、高压修复、微波修复及胃酶修复,然后进行免疫组化染色,比较何种修复方法修复后免疫组化染色效果最优。经微波修复阳性率(+++)者为80%,而背景(-)者达95%,综合效果明显优于其他三种方法(P<0.05)。由此可见,对p504 s免疫组化染色采用微波修复,可达到最佳染色效果。

【Abstract】 To determine the most appropriate retrieval method of p504s immunohistochemical staining for achieving the optimal staining effect,60 prostate cancer biopsies were collected.Each biopsy was cut into 4 samples and performed EDTA retrieval,high-pressure retrieval,microwave retrieval and pepsin retrieval respectively before immunohistochemical staining.The retrieval effects were compared to determine the optimal retrieval method.The results showed that 80% microwave retrieval samples were positive intensity(+++) while 95% samples were background(-).The combined effect was significantly better than all the other three methods.The optimal effect of p504s immunohistochemical staining can be achieved with microwave retrieval method.

【关键词】 修复p504s免疫组化染色比较
【Key words】 Retrievalp504sImmunohistochemistry stainingComparison
  • 【文献出处】 标记免疫分析与临床 ,Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2010年01期
  • 【分类号】R446.8;R697.3;R737.25
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】143
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络