节点文献

Recent progress in criterions for glass forming ability

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杨兵杜勇刘咏

【Author】 YANG Bing, DU Yong, LIU Yong State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Cen tral South University, Changsha 410083, China

【机构】 State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University

【摘要】 The glass-forming ability(GFA) is an important factor in studying metallic glasses. So far, there are several criteria for evaluating the glass-forming ability. For predicting compositions for bulk metallic glasses, however, they show more or less accuracy and versatility for different cases. In this work, four types of criteria for the glass-forming ability are categorized and reviewed: 1) Indicators with characteristic temperatures; 2) Indicators involving structural factors; 3) Indicators based on Miedema’s model; and 4) Indictors based on phase diagram. It is pointed out that a single indicator cannot be used to predict GFA of all the metallic glass systems correctly due to its limited theoretical framework, and the combination of multiple indicators shows more efficiency and accuracy. Though it is still very difficult to develop a universal indicator for GFA, recent indicators seem to be of more reliable physical meaning than those previously suggested.

【Abstract】 The glass-forming ability(GFA) is an important factor in studying metallic glasses. So far, there are several criteria for evaluating the glass-forming ability. For predicting compositions for bulk metallic glasses, however, they show more or less accuracy and versatility for different cases. In this work, four types of criteria for the glass-forming ability are categorized and reviewed: 1) Indicators with characteristic temperatures; 2) Indicators involving structural factors; 3) Indicators based on Miedema’s model; and 4) Indictors based on phase diagram. It is pointed out that a single indicator cannot be used to predict GFA of all the metallic glass systems correctly due to its limited theoretical framework, and the combination of multiple indicators shows more efficiency and accuracy. Though it is still very difficult to develop a universal indicator for GFA, recent indicators seem to be of more reliable physical meaning than those previously suggested.

【基金】 Project(50721003) supported by the Creative Research Group of National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • 【文献出处】 Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China ,中国有色金属学会会刊(英文版) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年01期
  • 【分类号】TQ171
  • 【被引频次】17
  • 【下载频次】67
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络