节点文献

乳腺癌术后密集与常规辅助化疗的对比临床研究

Clinical Contrast Study on Dose Dense and Regular Chemotherapy in the Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment for Breast Cancer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 吴卫华李青徐兵河张频赵龙妹袁芃王佳玉蔡锐刚

【Author】 WU Weihua~(1,2) LI Qing~1 XU Binghe~1 ZHANG Pin~1 ZHAO Longmei~1 YUAN Peng~1 WANG Jiayu~1 CAI Ruigang~11 Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital & Institute, CAMS&PUMC, Beijing 100021, China2 Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing 101149, China

【机构】 中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学肿瘤医院内科北京市胸科医院综合科

【摘要】 目的:观察表阿霉素(EPI)联合或序贯紫杉醇(PTX)剂量密集化疗在高复发风险乳腺癌辅助化疗中的疗效和耐受性,与EPI联合PTX3周方案比较,得出初步结论。方法:选取2003年12月至2006年12月中国医学科学院肿瘤医院173例具有高复发风险乳腺癌术后患者,将患者随机分为三组,分别采用EPI联合CTX序贯PTX的2周方案(EC→T密集组)、EPI联合PTX的2周方案(ET密集组)和EPI联合PTX的3周方案(ET常规组)进行辅助化疗。结果:EC→T密集组、ET密集组和ET常规组各入组56例、57例和60例患者。共有168例患者按计划完成化疗,中位随访36个月,密集组和常规组的3年无复发率分别为84.1%和80.0%(P=0.501),3年总生存率分别为95.6%和90.0%(P=0.153)。EC→T密集纽和ET密集组的3年无复发率分别为85.7%和82.5%(P=0.636),3年总生存率分别为92.9%和98.2%(P=0.164)。全组173例可评价毒性,Ⅲ~Ⅳ度主要的毒性为粒细胞减少、恶心、呕吐、肝功能损害和脱发。密集组与常规组的Ⅲ~Ⅳ度粒细胞减少发生率分别为14.2%和58.3%(P=0.000),其他毒性差异无统计学意义。比较两个密集组间毒性,差异无统计学意义。结论:EPI联合或序贯PTX密集辅助化疗是可行的,具有较好的疗效和耐受性,有改善患者无复发生存和总生存的趋势,粒细胞减少明显减轻,其他毒性未明显增加,化疗时间得以缩短。EPI联合或序贯PTX密集辅助化疗的两个方案,疗效和毒性相近。

【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the efficacy and tolerance of dose dense chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel concurrently or sequentially in the postoperative adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer and to draw a basic conclusion by comparing dose dense regimens with the regular regimen. Methods:A total of 173 high-risk breast cancer patients took part in the trial from December 2003 to December 2006. The postoper ative patients were randomly divided into three groups:the EC→T dose dense group, the ET dose dense group and the ET regular group. Results:There were 56 patients in the EC→T dpse dense group, 57 patients in the ET dose dense group and 60 patients in the ET regular group. One hundred and sixty-eight patients completed chemotherapy as planned. After the median follow-up of 36 months, the 3-year relapse-free and overall survival rates of the dose dense group and the regular group were 84.1% and 80.0% (P=0.501), 95.6% and 90.0% (P=0.153), respectively. The 3-year relapse-free survival rates and overall survival rates of the EC→T and the ET dose dense group were 85.7% and 82.5% (P=0.636), 92.9% and 98.2% (P=0.164), respectively. The toxicities were evaluated in 173 patients. The major grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ toxicities included neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, hepatic lesion and alopecia. The incidence of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ neutropenia was 14.2% in the dose dense group and 58.3% in the regular group (P=0.000). All toxicities were similar between the EC→ T and the ET dose dense group. The median DFS and OS were not obtained. Conclusion:Dose dense chemotherapy, concurrently or sequentially, with epirubicin and paclitaxel used as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk postoperative breast cancer was safe and effective and can improve the DFS and OS. The side effects were tolerable and the incidence of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ neutropenia was reduced when compared to the stan- dard treatment. Comparing the two dose dense regimens, concurrently or sequentially with epirubicin and paclitaxel, the efficacy and tolerance were similar.

  • 【文献出处】 中国肿瘤临床 ,Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年09期
  • 【分类号】R737.9
  • 【被引频次】6
  • 【下载频次】64
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络