节点文献

46例食管癌患者的临床手术治疗探讨

Analysis of clinical operation of 46 cases of esophageal cancer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 刘海林张明林利中杨忠杰黄忠明

【Author】 LIU Hai-lin,ZHANG Ming,LIN Li-zhong,et al(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Shanghai Fenxian Hospital,Shanghai 201400,China)

【机构】 上海奉贤区中心医院胸外科

【摘要】 目的分析食管癌的临床手术治疗方式与效果。方法本组研究对象为46例食管癌手术患者,病变位于食管上段12例,食管中段28例,食管下段6例;二切口手术21例,三切口25例。结果近期并发症发生率二切口组术后为9.5%,三切口组为36.0%,差异有显著性(P=0.030),两组均无术中死亡及住院死亡;二切口组术后1,3年生存率分别为84.2%和57.1%,三切口组分别为77.3%和50.0%。两组1,3年生存率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论手术采用三切口与二切口具有各自的优点与适用范围,需根据病变的具体情况而定;无论二切口还是三切口,采用颈部吻合都是较好的选择。

【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the clinical operative measures and efficacy of esophageal cancer treatment.Methods Forty-six patients with esophageal cancer were chosen for the study.Of them 12 had lesions located in the upper esophagus,28 located in the middle and 6 located in the lower esophagus.Operations of 21 cases used two incisions and 25 cases used three incisions.Results The incidence of postoperative complications in two incision group was 9.5% and three incision group 36.0%.The difference had significance(P=0.030).Neither group had intraoperative death and in hospital death.The survival rate of two incision group after 1 and 3 years were 84.2% and 57.1% respectively,while the three incision group 77.3% and 50.0%.The survival rates after 1 and 3 years of two groups had no statistical difference(P>0.05).Conclusion Three or two incisions in operation with their respective advantages and application area should be decided according to the specific circumstances of disease.Cervical anastomosis is a good choice whether two or three incisions are used.

【关键词】 食管肿瘤/外科学切口
【Key words】 Esophageal neoplasms/surgeryIncision
  • 【文献出处】 中国肿瘤临床与康复 ,Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年04期
  • 【分类号】R735.1
  • 【下载频次】31
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络