节点文献

中医“知信行”问卷的信度、效度评价

Analysis on Reliability and Validity of KAP Questionnaire of TCM

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈建伟; 李美婷; 何梅囡; 张万方;

【Author】 CHEN Jian-wei,LI Mei-ting,HE Mei-nan,et al.(Guangzhou University of TCM,Guangzhou,510403,Guangdong,China)

【机构】 广州中医药大学; 广州市健康教育所; 广州市荔湾区华林街社区卫生服务中心; 广州市荔湾区金花街社区卫生服务中心; 广州市荔湾区疾病预防控制中心;

【摘要】 [目的]评价通过德尔斐专家咨询法形成的《中医知信行问卷》的信度、效度。[方法]将《中医知信行问卷》运用于人群调查,通过调查结果分析问卷的信度、效度。[结果]29个指标的Spearman相关系数均大于0.6,(P<0.01)。问卷3部分及问卷总体Cronbach’s系数、分半信度均在0.75以上。对29个指标进行因子分析,产生3个公因子,总共能解释总体方差的65.4%,29个指标的因子负荷均大于0.4。[结论]本问卷的信度、效度符合要求,问卷具有较好的稳定性和内在一致性。

【Abstract】 [Objective]To evaluate the reliability and validity of KAP Questionnaire of TCM by Delphi.[Methods]By analyzing the results of the questionnaire survey,the reliability and validity were calculated.[Results]The correlation coefficient of 29 indicators were all over 0.6,and their P values were all less than 0.01.Each part and the whole Cronbach’s α coeficient of the questionnaire,split reliability were all over 0.75.three public factors were produced by factors analyzing of 29 indicators.they could explain 65.4% of the whole variance.The factor loadings of the 29 indicators were all over 0.4.[Conclusion]The reliability and validity of the questionnaire had reached the demands of standard questionnaire.

【关键词】 中医; 问卷; 信度; 效度;
【Key words】 TCM; Questionaire; Reliability; Validity;
【基金】 广州市中医药、中西医结合科研立项课题(2008A49)
  • 【文献出处】 预防医学论坛 ,Preventive Medicine Tribune , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年10期
  • 【分类号】R195
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】500
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络