【摘要】 本文通过对中国民族学史的回顾,讨论中国民族学学科在追求世界性学科规范与倡导本土学术发展之间的复杂关系及人们的思考。20世纪前半期,从学科规范的确立开始,中国民族学家创建了符合国际学理的学科体系;此后与应用政治实践相关,学术规范出现了向苏联模式的转型;至今中国人类学民族学界的相关争论依然不断,并使两种对立倾向蕴含其中,在应当相辅相成的学术规范和本土发展之间却出现了种种对立的认识和实践。本文就此进行梳理,主张用一种新的立场和策略来处理学科世界性与学术本土性之间的关系。更多还原

【Abstract】 The paper discusses the complex relations between the criterion of universal academia and the indigenized theoretical development through the view to ethnology in China. To begin with the establishing doctrinal frame, Chinese ethnologists constructed academic system according to the international version. The ethnic studies transferred to the Soviet model during 1950s, correlating with the political practices for nation-state construction. The opposite understanding and practice in Chinese ethnological and anthropological academia have been criticizing each other after disciplinal system reestablishment in China’s mainland. The author believes that the relation of academic universality and research indigenization should be reflected from the new viewpoint and strategy within cracking the dualistic contradictory of the relation.更多还原