节点文献

父母教养方式问卷(PBI)的信效度研究

The Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Parental Bonding Instrument

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 蒋奖许燕蒋菁于生凯郑芳芳

【Author】 Jiang Jiang1,3,Xu Yan1,3,Jiang Bijing2,Yu Shengkai1,Zheng Fangfang1 (1 School of Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875) (2 School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou,350002) (3 Beijing Normal University,Bejing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology,Beijing,100875)

【机构】 北京师范大学心理学院北京师范大学,应用实验心理北京市重点实验室福州大学人文社会科学学院应用心理学系

【摘要】 本研究对目前国外广泛使用的"父母教养方式问卷"(Parental Bonding Instrument,PBI)进行了中文版修订。708名大学生完成了测试,其中136人在两周后进行了重测,并用EMBU作为检验效度的指标之一。采用相关分析、验证性因素分析等方法考察问卷的信、效度。结果表明问卷的四因素结构模型优于二因素和三因素结构模型,各项拟合指标均在0.90以上;问卷的内部一致性信度在0.740-0.851之间,重测信度在0.619-0.765之间,均达到了心理测量学的要求。因此,修订后的中文版PBI具有良好的信效度指标,可以作为评定大学生父母教养方式的测量工具使用。

【Abstract】 To explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of PBI,708 college students participated in the investigation and 136 attended the retest two weeks later.EMBU was employed as an index of validity.Confirmatory analysis,reliability analysis and criteria validity revealed that the 4-factor scale was better than the two-factor and three-factor ones.The fit indices of the 4-factor model were all above 0.90,and α for the 4 subscales was between 0.740 and 0.851.The retest reliability was between 0.619 and 0.765.The correlations of the 6 factors and criterions were significant.So the reliability and validity of the 4-factor model of the scale were strongly supported and it can be used to test the parenting style of colleague students’ parents.

【基金】 北京师范大学青年科学基金(理科)资助。
  • 【文献出处】 心理科学 ,Psychological Science , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年01期
  • 【分类号】B841.7
  • 【被引频次】144
  • 【下载频次】6944
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络