节点文献

关于唯物史观研究的两个“盲区”

On Two "Blind Spots" of Historical Materialism Research

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王丽琦刘宝杰李学芝

【Author】 WANG Liqi1,LIU Baojie2,LI Xuezhi2 (1.College of Humanities and Public Administration,Huaqiao University,Quanzhou 362021,China;2.College of Environment and Tourism,Linyi Normal College,Linyi 276005,China)

【机构】 华侨大学人文与公共管理学院临沂师范学院环境与旅游学院

【摘要】 分析了学界近十年在唯物史观这一领域内对原著文本的探究中存在的两个"盲区":一是对恩格斯独著文本的"忽视";二是对马克思中后期文本的"忽视"。指出唯物史观的倪现、嬗变是随着马克思、恩格斯对欧洲革命,尤其是对英、法、德三国在社会发展中生产方式变革的深刻分析而渐渐成熟的革命性理论体系。认为对《英国工人阶级状况》《1848年至1850年的法兰西阶级斗争》《德国的革命与反革命》和《路易.波拿巴的雾月十八日》等文本的探究尤为必要。

【Abstract】 The two "blind spots" in the field of historical materialism research of the scholars to the original text in the last decade are analyzed.One spot is of ignoring the text of Engels himself,the other is of overlooking the part of latter text of Marx.It is pointed out that the historical materialism comes out and evolution along with the development of Marx and Engels on the European revolution,especially the social development and the profound changes in production methods in Britain,France and Germany,and becomes a revolutionary theoretical system gradually.The exploring of "Status of the British Working Class","French Class Struggle from 1848 to 1850","German Revolution and Counter-revolutionary","Louis?Bonaparte’s 18th of the Fog Month",etc.,is very necessary.

  • 【文献出处】 沈阳大学学报 ,Journal of Shenyang University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年02期
  • 【分类号】A811;B03
  • 【下载频次】187
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络