【摘要】 庭审交际是以信息流动为主要特征的动态过程,信息在交际参与者中间流动时产生的重要人际意义是说服。本文结合语言学研究中相关的信息理论以及传播学中Hovland的信息传播说服模型,构建了庭审交际中信息势能与说服效果关系模式,并在此基础上对所搜集的语料进行分析。研究表明,在法庭问话中答话人往往会采用提高知名度,增加可信度和表明动机等说服手段增强信息的势能,从而提高说服效果;法官则往往采用搁置、拒绝、质疑等对策,减弱信息势能,保持客观立场。更多还原

【Abstract】 Courtroom interaction is a dynamic process characterized by information flow.One of the important interpersonal meanings of information flow is persuasion.Based on the relative linguistic theories on information and Hovland’s model of persuasion,this paper develops a linguistic model to explain the relation between information potential energy and its persuasive effects,on the basis of which courtroom interactions are analyzed.The findings indicate that courtroom interaction participants,when answering questions,adopt such persuasive tactics as enhancing source recognition,raising source credibility and displaying sound motives to increase information potential energy,thus enhancing persuasive effects,while judges try to remain an impartial position by adopting such tactics as ignoring,refusing and doubting.更多还原