节点文献

3种血细胞分析仪检测结果比对及偏差评估

Comparison and bias estimation of test results acquired from three different hematology analyzers

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 岑欢李介华王欢张梅许葆然卢志权

【Author】 CEN Huan,LI Jie-hua,WANG Huan,ZHANG Mei,XU Bao-ran,LU Zhi-quan.Department of Clinical Laboratory,the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Medical College,Ji’ nan University,Qingyuan 511500,China

【机构】 暨南大学医学院第五附属医院检验科

【摘要】 目的对3种血细胞分析仪的重复性及检验结果的差异进行方法学对比和偏差评估,探讨不同型号血细胞分析仪检测结果是否具有可比性及偏差是否在允许范围内。方法以可溯源的贝克曼COULT血细胞分析仪为参比仪器,迈瑞BC-3000血细胞分析仪(BC-3000)和希森美康XS-1000i血细胞分析仪(XS-1000i)为检测仪器,用新鲜抗凝全血在3种仪器上检测,对检测结果进行分析评估。结果3种仪器检测白细胞、红细胞、血红蛋白、血小板4个项目经F检验差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),偏差均在允许范围。结论3种仪器性能稳定,重复性佳,相关性良好,结果具有可比性,在临床中可同时或交替使用。

【Abstract】 Objective To analyze and compare the repeatability,differences among the test results acquired from three different hematology analyzers,evaluate the bias,and explore whether the results from different types of hematology analyzers are comparable or not,as well as whether the deviations are within the allowable range.Methods The traceable Beckman COULT hematology analyzer(COULT) was used as the reference instrument,while Mindray(BC-3000) and Sysmex XS-1000i hematology analyzer(XS-1000i) were set as the detection systems.The fresh anticoagulated whole blood was collected and measured with three different hematology analyzers.The test results were analyzed and evaluated.Results There were no statistical differences via F test in test results of WBC,RBC,HB and PLT among the three detection systems(P>0.05).The deviations were within the allowable range.Conclusion The three instruments are of stable performance,good repeatability,and ideal correlation.The test results are comparable.Therefore,the three instruments can be used in the meantime or by turns in clinical work.

  • 【文献出处】 检验医学与临床 ,Laboratory Medicine and Clinic , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年06期
  • 【分类号】R446.11
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】68
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络