节点文献

对北京体育大学散打专项训练课和选修课教学现状的对比研究

Comparison Research on the Teaching Actuality between Sanda Training Course and the Optional Courses

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李俊峰王华锋

【Author】 Li Junfeng,Wang Huafeng (Sanda Teaching and Research Section,Beijing University of Physical Education,Beijing,100084,China)

【机构】 北京体育大学散打教研室

【摘要】 通过对北京体育大学散打专项教学课和选修课课堂教学现状的调查对比分析表明:散打训练课和选修课的课程成绩考核都突出了技能的考核,但专项训练课考核过于单一,选修课则缺乏对技术运用能力的考察;专项训练课的练习密度和强度都明显高于选修课;专项训练课学生的学习动机需要进一步引导,防身自卫是选修课学生选择散打的第一动机;影响专项训练学生兴趣的首要因素是场地器材,对于选修课学生,影响的首要因素则是目标和动力。

【Abstract】 Based on the researches of the actual operations of the Sanda training courses and the optional courses,this paper arrives at the following conclusions:the aims of the Sanda training courses and the optional courses are all quite ambiguous,lacking national features;the tests of these courses all focus on the techniques,however,the tests of the Sanda training courses ignore other aspects and the tests of the optional courses lack in examing the ability of using the tequeniques;the Sanda training courses have better frequency and intensity than the optional courses;the students of the optional courses should be better motivated and now their foremost motivation is to learn the techniques of protecting themselves;the most important factor affecting the students’ interest in attending the training courses is the playground and the equipment while for the students in the optional courses it’s the aim and the motivation that count.

【基金】 北京体育大学2006年校管课题
  • 【文献出处】 吉林体育学院学报 ,Journal of Jilin Institute of Physical Education , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年01期
  • 【分类号】G852.4
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】292
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络