节点文献

激光熔覆层形貌预测对比分析

Comparative analysis on predictions of the geometric form of laser clading

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 赵洪运杨贤群舒凤远徐春华

【Author】 ZHAO Hongyun, YANG Xianqun, Shu Fengyuan, XU Chunhua, WU Jianqian (School of materials science and engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai, Weihai 264209, Shandong China)

【机构】 哈尔滨工业大学(威海)材料科学与工程学院

【摘要】 将多元线性回归分析和遗传神经网络对比应用于激光熔覆层形貌的预测,确定了主要工艺参数(激光功率、扫描速率、送粉速率)和激光熔覆层形貌(熔覆层宽、高、基体熔深)之间的对应关系.结果表明,多元线性回归分析应用于激光熔覆层的形貌预测是可行的,五组检验数据的平均相对误差为6.05%;基于遗传算法优化的神经网络预测熔覆层形貌是可靠的,五组检验数据的平均相对误差为2.49%.二者相比较,前者应用较方便,能直观的获得熔覆层宽、高、熔深等参数与熔覆层形貌参数之间的函数关系;后者精度相对较高,但运算过程相对复杂,函数关系模糊.一般情况下推荐采用多元线性回归分析.

【Abstract】 A comparison between the analytical methods of multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA) and genetic algorithm optimizing neural networks was made for predicting the geometric form of laser cladding. The corresponding relationship between main processing parameters (laser power, scanning volocity and powder mass flow rate) and the geometrric form of clad(ding width, height and depth of the penetration into she substrate) was affirmed.The result proved the feasiblity of using MLRA to predict the geometric form of laser ding and the averrage relative error of five test values was 2.49%. In comparison,the former is convenient in applic ation by which functional relationship between parameters such as width, height and depth of the penetration and so on. While the later produces a better precision and a invisible function relationship with a more complex operation process. Often the MLRA method is usuallyre commended.

【基金】 哈尔滨工业大学(威海)研究基金资助HIT(WH)200711
  • 【文献出处】 焊接学报 ,Transactions of the China Welding Institution , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年01期
  • 【分类号】TG456.7
  • 【被引频次】42
  • 【下载频次】642
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络