【摘要】 被害人陈述与证人证言都属于人证,二者之间的关系极为密切,在我国刑事诉讼法中也有着诸多的共同制度安排,也存在着明显的制度差异。被害人具有当事人与实质证人的双重诉讼角色,虽然没有必须出庭的义务,但却有权全程参与刑事审判,而证人必须是当事人以外的人,在立法上被赋予应当出庭作证的义务,但无权全程参与刑事审判。在证明方向上,被害人陈述具有单向性、控诉性的特征,从而显著区别于证人证言。在主体适格性、庭审质证及作证保障等方面,较之证人证言的相对严密、规范的制度安排,被害人陈述的制度设计有进一步改良的需要。更多还原

【Abstract】 The victim statement and witness oral testimony all belong to human testimony ,and their relation is extremely close.As for the victim statement and witness oral testimony ,system arrangement has a lot of common ,on the other hand ,discrepancy between them is obvious in our country’s criminal procedure law. The victim has double roles in the criminal procedure ,and has right whole journey to participate in criminal trial ,although not having the duty must appear in court. Witness must be the people outside the litigant,and,thought he ought to appear in court as a witness,he has no right whole journey to participate in criminal trial. Distinguished with witness oral testimony,victim statement has the one-way direction and prosecuting role in proof. In the field of main body ,court hearing and giving evidence ensuring and so on,witness oral testimony system is relatively close ,standard,comparative,the system of the victim states must be reformed further.更多还原