【摘要】 应用日本声学家安藤四一提出的主观优选理论,对白瑞纳克收集的其中6个音乐厅在正厅中心位置附近的音质进行主观评价.评价结果和白瑞纳克的调查访谈结论作比较,发现2者在音乐厅的等级排序上有明显不同.结果分析表明,这种不同与文中主观优选理论评价音质时只选取一个听音位置计算有关,而白瑞纳克所作的音质调查访谈其实是对整个音乐厅音质印象的一种综合评价.在比较2种音质评价方法之后指出,由于具有可以获得厅堂内不同位置的音质分布从而能够更加全面地评价厅堂音质以及易于实现的特点,主观优选理论的音质评价方法理应在音乐厅音质设计的实践中受到重视.更多还原

【Abstract】 The timbre at the center of six concert halls collected by Beranek was evaluated in terms of subjective preference by means of subjective preference theory provided by Japanese acoustician Yochi Ando.Then,the result was compared with Beranek’s investigation result.These two results were distinctly different in connection with the rank ordering of concert halls.Result analysis indicated that the difference was caused by the fact that only one listening position was evaluated when the subjective preference theory was used for timbre evaluation.The timbre investigation conducted by Beranek was actually a kind of overall evaluation for whole concert hall.After comparing the two evaluation methods,this paper pointed out that special attention should be paid to the evaluation method for timbre design of concert halls in terms of subjective preference theory.This was due to the fact that the distribution of timbre in the halls could be achieved so that a more comprehensive and more actual timbre evaluation could be made and easily implemented.更多还原