【摘要】 在学术界逐渐摒弃《孔子家语》"伪书"说的同时,仍有学者认为《家语》是由《说苑》等文献经孔安国等人之手"层累"而造成的。通过对比分析《说苑》与《家语》两者互见的材料,将有助于我们对该问题的再认识。同时,此类研究方法混淆了后人主观作伪与客观整理之间的区别,应该启发我们对古籍研究方法的反思。更多还原

【Abstract】 As the academic world is gradually rejecting the "pseudograph" of Confucius Jiayu,some learners are still in the opinion that the book is formed by the pile of Shuoyuan and other references made by Kong Anguo and his partners.Through the comparison and analysis of cross-references between Shuoyuan and Confucius Jiayu,it will improve our recognition of this problem.At the same time,this kind of research method has confused the differences between subjective simulation and objective collation made by the posterity.It should stimulate the reflection of the academic world on the research method on ancient books.更多还原